Downsizing in Retirement: Things to Consider
Downsizing Sounds Simple…
Let’s meet Ross, age 67, and Emily, age 65. They are both planning to retire at the end of this year. They live in a 4-bedroom detached home where they raised their four children, all of whom are grown and living on their own.
The main issue for them is whether it is time to downsize.
The idea seems sensible. Downsizing will:
- free up home equity;
- reduce maintenance;
- simplify life; and
- prepare them for their later retirement years.
But almost immediately, they come up with questions that only seem to make things more complicated:
- Where would they move?
- Would the move actually save money?
- Would they still have room for visiting children and grandchildren?
- Would they lose more than square footage?
Downsizing may be a good decision, but it is not necessarily an automatic financial win or a simple lifestyle upgrade.
The Costs and Trade-offs are more Layered than Expected
A. Start With the Obvious Financial Side
A larger home may hold a lot of equity, especially if it is mortgage-free or nearly mortgage-free. Selling it may free up money for investing or reduce monthly expenses.
But the gross sale price is not the amount available for retirement spending. There are frictional costs to consider:
- real estate commissions;
- legal fees;
- moving costs;
- land transfer tax on the next purchase, if applicable;
- mortgage discharge penalties or bridge financing, if applicable;
- repairs, painting, cleaning, staging, and decluttering before the sale;
- furniture, appliances, window coverings, accessibility updates, etc., after the move.
B. Then Compare the Housing Options
From a family-sized detached home, Ross and Emily might move to:
- A smaller detached home. This is a familiar ownership arrangement – no condo fees required – and a smaller space is in line with what they are hoping for. However, they will still have to contend with yard work, snow removal, maintenance and repairs, property tax, and insurance.
- A townhouse. This option will probably lead to less work outside, but in exchange, there will likely be some condo fees. In addition, many townhouses have several floors with the accompanying stairs, making accessibility a potential issue down the road.
- A multi-storey condominium. Maintenance will likely be reduced even further, access will almost certainly be via elevator, and the unit will be on one floor. This sounds good, but condo fees are generally higher here, rules might prevent them from doing things they would like to do, and there is the spectre of possible special assessments and inadequate reserve funds.
- A rental apartment. Two big benefits for this choice are, first, that the net proceeds from the sale of Ross and Emily’s home are fully available, and second, the responsibilities of home ownership are eliminated. On the other hand, Ross and Emily would become subject to rent increases, landlord decisions, including possible evictions, and less long-term control in general.
The key financial warning here is that a smaller home is not always a cheaper home. It may be newer, better located, and more accessible, but there may be expenses that are unwanted or even unacceptable. Once the financial number-crunching is done, Ross and Emily may discover that the harder questions are not only about money.
Downsizing Changes More Than the Monthly Budget
A. Family Hosting and Identity
Their current home may be too large most weekdays but just right during family visits. For Ross and Emily, this is a big issue. Nearby children and grandchildren often stay overnight when visiting on the weekend. Two of their children live far enough away that they have to fly in, and they are happy that they have the space to offer several nights of accommodation.
For all the financial and maintenance issues that are resolved, downsizing will mean fewer overnight visits, hotel stays for their children if they do come, and losing their role as hosts for family gatherings. These changes may be inevitable at some point, but they are a bit hard to stomach right now.
B. Emotional Attachment
For households that have moved around a lot, a home may not mean much, but for Ross and Emily, their house represents decades of memories raising their children. They have a sense of belonging that they would be hard-pressed to recreate elsewhere. Given the years that have passed, downsizing would require decisions about what to keep, give away, sell, or throw out. This could be as tiring emotionally as it would be physically.
C. Community and Daily Life
After over 30 years in one location, a move could potentially change a whole host of things. For one thing, Ross, who has a chronic illness, is worried that changing communities would mean finding a new family doctor and specialist. They are also deeply involved in their local church; relocating elsewhere would mean connecting with a new faith community. Their neighbours of decades are another source of community engagement that they are loath to give up. The anticipated disruptions truly give them pause when it comes to downsizing.
The Better Question: What Job Does the Home Need to Do Now?
Instead of immediately asking, “Should we downsize?” Ross and Emily may also want to ask, “What does our home need to do for us in this stage of life?”
This reframes the decision. Their home used to provide a good setting for raising their children, among other things. Other considerations may now be assuming greater importance, though. These are questions that should be asked about their current home and any newer place they might choose to move to.
- Are the costs manageable?
- How much maintenance will be required?
- Will their home be safe and accessible as they get older?
- Will they have the space for family gatherings?
- Will they live reasonably close to health care?
- Will they have good transportation options if one or both of them lose the ability to drive?
- Can they have a community that gives them a sense of belonging?
- Will they have the flexibility to make changes if one spouse dies or needs care?
- Will they have the financial resources they need for their later years in retirement?
A Four-Part Framework to Answer the Question
For Ross, Emily, and others who are thinking about downsizing their home when they retire, here are four categories of questions to ask when trying to decide.
- Money
- What is the expected net financial benefit after all costs?
- How will any surplus be invested?
- Will new investment income affect OAS (the recovery tax or “clawback”), GIS, or other income-tested benefits?
- Is the goal better cash flow, more liquidity, or reduced risk?
- Maintenance
- What work around the house is becoming difficult?
- Could hiring help be enough?
- Would a smaller detached home still leave too much responsibility?
- Mobility
- Would the new home work if one spouse could not drive?
- Are stairs, bathrooms, entrances, snow, parking, and medical access suitable for future anticipated needs?
- Would this home still work 10 or 15 years from now?
- Meaning
- What role does the current home play in family life?
- What memories and responsibilities are attached to it?
- What would be gained by moving?
- What would be lost?
This framework won’t produce the same answer for everyone. What it will do is bring clarity to the inevitable trade-offs.
There May be More Than Two Choices
A. Avoid the False Choice
Ross and Emily do not have only the two options of staying in their current home or moving to a small condo. There are middle options, too.
B. Possible Alternatives
Depending on finances, health, and preferences, they might:
- Stay and adapt their current home
- add accessibility features;
- create a main-floor bedroom or bathroom;
- hire help for snow removal, lawn care, house cleaning, maintenance, and repairs;
- reduce their possessions gradually.
- Downsize locally
- remain near doctors, church, friends, and family;
- choose a new home with enough flexibility for guests;
- keep one extra room for family visits.
- Rent for flexibility
- free up money;
- avoid ownership maintenance;
- test a new community without a long-term commitment;
- but understand rent and security-of-tenure risks.
- Move in stages
- declutter first;
- test neighbourhoods;
- visit condo buildings at different times of the day;
- review costs before listing the home;
- have family conversations before decisions become urgent.
C. Planning Reduces Pressure
The best decisions are usually made before a crisis hits:
- before health changes force a move;
- before one spouse is left to decide alone;
- before adult children must step in;
- before the home becomes unmanageable.
The goal is not to choose the smallest possible home. The goal is to choose a home that fits the next season of life.
A Wise Downsizing Decision Combines Math and Honesty
Downsizing can be helpful. It can free equity tied up in the home, reduce work, simplify life, and prepare for future needs. But it can also bring hidden costs, less control, fewer family-hosting options, and emotional loss.
For Ross and Emily, the answer may not be obvious. The right answer depends on what they value, what they can afford, and what their home needs to do for them.
Downsizing is not only a real estate decision. It is a retirement planning decision, a family decision, and a life-stage decision.
A question you may wish to put to yourself if you are approaching or in retirement:
“Will this move make our retirement more secure, more manageable, and more like the life we actually hope to live?”
If the answer is yes, downsizing may be wise. If the answer is no, or not yet, staying put may also be wise.
Either way, the decision deserves more than a quick calculation of the sale price minus the purchase price.
This is the 312th blog post for Russ Writes, first published on 2026-06-29.
If you would like to discuss this or other posts, connect on Facebook, Twitter aka X, LinkedIn, Instagram, Mastodon, or Bluesky.
If you are an existing client, please contact me by email for an appointment.
If you are a potential new client seeking an advice-only financial planner, I am preparing for retirement and am no longer accepting new clients. Please go to the Advice-Only Planners website. All members listed are also members of the Financial Planning Association of Canada.
Disclaimer: This blog post is intended for general information and discussion purposes only. It should not be relied upon for investment, insurance, tax, or legal decisions.
Image created by ChatGPT